Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.
-Henry Kissinger
If you can make a girl laugh, you can make her do anything.
-Marilyn Monroe
Humor, what causes laughter, and how to be funny is the subject of countless books and articles. All of the ones I’ve read are wrong. Either they point to the wrong thing, or they say no one knows, or no one CAN know. Maybe, but here’s my hypothesis. Be warned, it’s a frame control addicts excuse to go truly rabid.
People laugh to disperse tension, this is the function of laughter. There are other things that can relieve tension, such as sex or violence. If tension is NOT dispersed, awkwardness ensues.
I think of awkwardness as the feeling people get when they are forced into an uncommonly limited set of responses. Specifically a set of responses which do not include a choice that releases tension. Thus when a really polite guy tells a girl he just met he likes her, it’s awkward, while when I tell a girl I just met I want to put a baby in her, it’s not. In the first case, she HAS to be nice, she’s FORCED to give a polite negative response she doesn’t have an autopilot pattern for. In the second case, she can tell me to fuck off, act like it’s a joke, act like I’m serious, laugh, ect. Awkwardness is being boxed in.
Laughter is what happens when something unexpected occurs that must be addressed, and the group decides to release the tension rather than let it manifest as awkwardness. Why isn’t this done all the time? Because laughter is a temporary loss of control. (Keep in mind this is all a subconscious process.)
When someone says something unexpected, observers ping for the perceived social value differential between their current imprint and that of the person who has just spoken. If the person delivering the joke has more PSV (perceived social value,) or has established enough comfort, the observer releases tension by laughing. If not, they maintain tension, and awkwardness ensues.
Some things, such as applications of the absurd, clever uses of language, and magic, cause a sort of glitch in the brain. Laughter results, but it is STILL a release of tension, and it is STILL caused by something unexpected being observed.
The advantage though, is that the PVD (perceived value differential) is far less important because it is not the man, but the material, “making” them laugh. There is still a strong correlation, however, as David Blaine and Conan O’Brian, who have monstrous PSV, will get far better reactions with the same material and delivery than someone without such high PSV.
This explains both why the guy at the top of the social circle gets the most laughs, often for things that are not funny, and also why most people aren’t funny at all. Because they have been conditioned NOT to say things that deviate very far from what is expected. The more unexpected the statement, the more potentially funny; and the more potentially awkward.
How do we learn to BE funny?
Same way we learn to BE naturally attractive.
By eliminating the Ego, learning to be 100% expressive, making a habit of saying whatever pops into our heads, and not hanging around people who will condition us to avoid such behaviors.
This is an instance where your old friends who see themselves and you as “normal” will really stunt growth, as they will impose limiting beliefs on you and punish you for acting outside the box they have constructed for you.
The easiest way to start is something I learned from Russell Brand.
Substitute an uncommonly used word or phrase for a commonly used one.
People are always constructing an expectation about what’s about to happen.
When you foil that expectation, tension is created.
Example:
(You’re at starbucks ordering coffee)
“Hello, I’m thirsty, I’d like a latte.”
Vs
“Hello, I’m thirsty, I’d like some sort of caffeinated libation.”
The first request is utterly predictable, the second often elicits a smile or giggle, simply because it breaks the pattern of boredom and predictability that permeates the poor barista’s existence.
This is unlikely to make a girl crack up, but it’s also unlikely to cause her to be rude, or to hold the tension and create awkwardness either.
On the other hand:
“Hey, you had such a nice body I had to come over here and see what your personality was like.”
Vs
“Hey, you had such a nice personality I had to come over here and see what your body is like.”
The first is just kinda sleezy, the second, which is unexpected and satirical, has a lot more upside, but can result in a much rougher response if the girl does not feel you are “good enough” to act that way. (Keep in mind this isn’t a conscious process of assessment, people aren’t generally aware that they will applaud behavior in some people and condemn the same behaviors in others.)
When studying breaking rapport, you’re essentially studying ways to exhibit unpredictable behavior. Rapport is a feeling of understanding the other person, so what is not expected by definition breaks rapport. The more outlandish the break, the more attraction it will inspire; but the more value or comfort you must have for the girl to be willing to laugh and disperse the tension. The smaller the break, the less tension is creates, and the more likely a woman will be to relieve that tension. The less attraction or compliance you have once the woman assesses you, the smaller the breaks you must use to ensure her natural response is to relieve tension rather than hold it and create awkwardness. If the tension you create is suitably small, it will be socially unintelligent of her not to relieve it. (Keep in mind there are two sides to this: her laughter response is not conscious, while her compliance response is.)
Everyone sees patterns, that’s how the brain functions. Anything that defies expectation breaks the anticipated patten and creates tension. Tension must be released to avoid awkwardness. Laughter is the easiest way to release tension. A man who can inspire laughter is a man who can control the people around him.
Till next time guys,
If you don’t know what to say, just say something.
Love ya!
-The Braeden


